Founder-Director

Federal trust relationship with American Indians

Indigenous issues ranging from spirituality and environment to education and land rights

English

Twin Buttes, North Dakota

Jodi Rave Spotted Bear

<html><head></head><body>Here is the opinion: Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion An excerpt: Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, Â§ 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s … <a href="http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/sixth-circuit-reverses-in-michigan-v-sault-ste-marie-tribe/">Continue reading →</a><figure class="wp-block-image aligncenter max-w-golden mx-auto text-center"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="" border="0" src="/api/proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstats.wordpress.com%2Fb.gif%3Fhost%3Dturtletalk.wordpress.com%26blog%3D1804110%26post%3D38239%26subd%3Dturtletalk%26ref%3D%26feed%3D1" width="1" height="1" class="next-image object-cover"></figure> <a target="blank" href="http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/sixth-circuit-reverses-in-michigan-v-sault-ste-marie-tribe/">read more</a>
</body></html>

Here is the opinion: Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion An excerpt: Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, Â§ 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s … <a href="http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/2013/12/18/sixth-circuit-reverses-in-michigan-v-sault-ste-marie-tribe/">Continue reading →</a>

Sixth Circuit Reverses in Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe