Native Vote
Nov 12, 2026

Court says Native Vote T-shirts allowed at polls

Native Vote and Get Out the Native Vote messaging are nonpartisan apparel, U.S. district court judge says


Shaun Griswold

Shaun Griswold

November 12, 2026

In 2024, Lonnie Provost, a Yankton Sioux Tribe member, was denied his right to vote at the Wagner National Guard Armory in Wagner, South Dakota, because he refused to remove his T-shirt that read “NATIVE vote.”

On Election Day last week, a U.S. District Court judge ruled that Native vote messaging is non-partisan and protected speech under the First Amendment. Shirts designed to promote voting for Native Americans, unlike messages for candidates or ballot initiatives, are allowable polling site attire, according to the decision

The Native American Rights Fund brought the case to court, and also provided guidance to South Dakota poll workers ahead of the recent midterm elections on how to spot the shirts to prevent issues like what Provost encountered in 2024. 

“Differences in artwork or wording alone do not remove apparel from this protection,” U.S. District Court Judge Karen Schreier wrote. “This order does not excuse compliance with otherwise lawful voter qualifications and voting procedures or authorize campaigning, intimidation, or disruptive conduct.”

Spotted an error? Suggest a correction.

We provide independent Native-focused reporting that gives our communities the context and the facts they need to make informed decisions.

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, we exist to illuminate tribal government decision-making for everyone who cares about transparency about Native issues. Because the consequences of restricted press freedom affect our communities every day, our trauma-informed reporting is rooted in a deep, firsthand expertise. Every gift helps keep the fire burning. A monthly contribution makes the biggest impact.