Legal saga continues for Northern Cheyenne Tribe

The chiefs on Aug. 21 requested to appeal the earlier decision, which favored reinstating the representatives whose authority came into question last fall. Though originally elected to the Tribal Council following the tribe’s constitutional procedures, most of them were replaced in contested a special election last October amid allegations of embezzlement and corruption.

So far, there aren’t any criminal findings regarding financial misconduct of the ousted council. Many of the allegations surround questions of how federal funds were spent related to COVID-19 relief.

Meanwhile, the specially elected representatives and the three chiefs in their corner — Larry Medicine Bull, Wesley Spotted Elk and Roger Killsnight — remain at odds with the eight officials who held the Tribal Council seats prior to the special election last year.

The tumultuous events were brought to the attention of the Bureau of Indian Affairs multiple times throughout the past year, but the BIA chose a policy path of “noninterference.” The BIA Northern Cheyenne Agency initially expressed support for the group of eight original council members fighting to retain their elected office. But the bureau later reversed course, citing its policy of intra-tribal governance wherein a tribe has the responsibility as a sovereign to resolve the issues independently.

While the ousted council members remain hopeful for a speedy reinstatement after a yearlong absence, the Aug. 21 request on behalf of the specially elected council members and the Traditional Chiefs offers little indication that the situation is nearing resolution.

Attorney Dion Killsback asked the appellate court to suspend the Trial Court order during the appellate review, stating: “A stay is necessary to preserve the status quo, prevent irreparable injury to the Chiefs’ traditional authority and responsibilities, avoid inconsistent enforcement while the related appeal of the Council Defendants is pending, and prevent further governmental and community disruption before the appellate court determines whether the Trial Court possessed jurisdiction and correctly applied Northern Cheyenne law.”