Split Sixth Circuit Panel Rules in Favor of Sault Tribe in $74 Million Contract Dispute


Here are the materials in Gatzaros v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians: Gatzaros Opening Brief Sault Tribe Brief Gatzaros Reply Brief CA6 Opinion The parties have litigated in bankruptcy court, too — see here.read more

Jodi Rave Spotted Bear

(Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation)

Founder & Editor in Chief

Location: Twin Buttes, North Dakota

Spoken Languages: English

Topic Expertise: Federal trust relationship with American Indians; Indigenous issues ranging from spirituality and environment to education and land rights

See the journalist page
Jodi Rave Spotted Bear

Sharing Is Caring

This article is not included in our Story Share & Care selection.

The content may only be reproduced with permission from the Indigenous Media Freedom Alliance. Please see our content sharing guidelines.

© Buffalo's Fire. All rights reserved.

Respect The Fire

At Buffalo's Fire, we value constructive dialogue that builds an informed Indian Country. To keep this space healthy, moderators will remove:

  • Personal attacks, harassment, or hate speech
  • Spam, misinformation, or unsolicited promotion
  • Off-topic rants and excessive shouting (All Caps)

Let’s keep the fire burning with respect.

Split Sixth Circuit Panel Rules in Favor of Sault Tribe in $74 Million Contract Dispute | Buffalo’s Fire