Federal judge allows cases challenging Oklahoma prosecutors’ authority to proceed
A federal judge declined to dismiss two lawsuits challenging whether northeast Oklahoma prosecutors can prosecute Native Americans for crimes committed in Indian Country, according to KOSU. The U.S. Department of Justice and several tribes are suing district attorneys Matthew Ballard and Carol Iski, alleging they exceeded their jurisdiction by prosecuting tribal members on reservations outside their own tribal nations.
Ballard and Iski argued the cases should be dismissed based on the recent Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decision Tulsa v. O’Brien, which held that state courts have jurisdiction over non-member Indians in Indian Country. U.S. District Judge Claire Eagan ruled that Oklahoma law does not align with federal law on the issue and denied the motions to dismiss, according to KOSU. The DOJ, Cherokee Nation, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and Muscogee Nation are plaintiffs in both cases, with the Chickasaw Nation also joining the case against Ballard.
- 1.KOSU.
Help us keep the fire burning, make a donation to Buffalo’s Fire
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, we exist to illuminate tribal government for everyone who cares about transparency in Native issues. Our work bridges the gap left by tribal-controlled media and non-Native, extractive journalism, providing the insights necessary for truly informed decision-making and a better quality of life. Because the consequences of restricted press freedom affect our communities every day, our trauma-informed reporting is rooted in a deep, firsthand expertise.
Every gift helps keep the fire burning. A monthly contribution makes the biggest impact. Cancel anytime.